{"meta":{"version":"2.1","_links":{"self":{"href":"https://api.vam.ac.uk/v2/object/O79087"},"collection_page":{"href":"https://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O79087/"}},"images":{"_primary_thumbnail":"https://framemark.vam.ac.uk/collections/2006AM6965/full/!100,100/0/default.jpg","_iiif_image":"https://framemark.vam.ac.uk/collections/2006AM6965/","_alt_iiif_image":[],"imageResolution":"high","_images_meta":[{"assetRef":"2006AM6965","copyright":"© Victoria and Albert Museum, London","sensitiveImage":false}]},"see_also":{"_iiif_pres":"https://iiif.vam.ac.uk/collections/O79087/manifest.json","_alt_iiif_pres":[]}},"record":{"systemNumber":"O79087","accessionNumber":"M.47-1992","objectType":"Dessert spoon","titles":[],"summaryDescription":"<b>Object Type</b><br>Spoons  of different shapes and sizes for specific activities like eating dessert or soup or for taking snuff developed in the 17th century. The dessert spoon was not commonly used until the early 18th century, when matching sets of cutlery became standard, with table spoons used for soup and smaller spoons for eating the fresh and candied fruits of  dessert.<br><br><b>Design & Designing</b><br>This spoon is in the Old English pattern, one of the most popular styles for cutlery services. It evolved in the mid-18th century from earlier spoon designs and is still produced today. The first design used for matching services of cutlery  was the Dog Nose, but the wavy end was uncomfortable to hold and the form was soon superseded by the simpler Hanoverian and Old English patterns. The most marked difference between these two patterns is the down-turned handle. This reflects the change to the laying of cutlery on the table. The British broke away from the Continental tradition of laying spoons and forks with the bowl and tines face down on the table. Instead, spoons were  laid with the open bowl uppermost. Crests and marks of ownership were now placed, as here, on the front of the spoon handle.<br><br><b>Material & Technique</b><br>A spoon of Sheffield plate is a very rare survival. The material wore badly at the edges and the food could be tainted by the copper  beneath. Although cheaper than silver, these spoons were an expensive alternative to pewter. The cost and difficulty of manufacture, as well as the poor durability, explains why so few spoons of this sort survive.","physicalDescription":"","artistMakerPerson":[{"name":{"text":"Unknown","id":"A1848"},"association":{"text":"","id":""},"note":""}],"artistMakerOrganisations":[],"artistMakerPeople":[],"materials":[],"techniques":[],"materialsAndTechniques":"Sheffield plate (copper plated with silver)","categories":[{"text":"Metalwork","id":"THES48920"},{"text":"Tableware & cutlery","id":"THES48888"},{"text":"Eating","id":"THES48963"},{"text":"British Galleries","id":"THES48985"}],"styles":[],"collectionCode":{"text":"MET","id":"THES48599"},"images":["2006AM6965"],"imageResolution":"high","galleryLocations":[{"current":{"text":"118E (VA)","id":"THES49228"},"free":"","case":"CA1","shelf":"","box":"21"}],"partTypes":[[{"text":"Spoon","id":""}]],"contentWarnings":[{"apprise":"","note":""}],"placesOfOrigin":[{"place":{"text":"Sheffield","id":"x29138"},"association":{"text":"made","id":"x28654"},"note":"possibly"},{"place":{"text":"Birmingham","id":"x28748"},"association":{"text":"made","id":"x28654"},"note":"possibly"}],"productionDates":[{"date":{"text":"ca. 1800","earliest":"1795-01-01","latest":"1804-12-31"},"association":{"text":"made","id":"x28654"},"note":""}],"associatedObjects":[],"creditLine":"Given by G. L. Giachin","dimensions":[{"dimension":"Height","value":"2","unit":"cm","qualifier":"","date":{"text":"","earliest":null,"latest":null},"part":"","note":""},{"dimension":"Width","value":"4.3","unit":"cm","qualifier":"","date":{"text":"","earliest":null,"latest":null},"part":"","note":""},{"dimension":"Depth","value":"22.3","unit":"cm","qualifier":"","date":{"text":"","earliest":null,"latest":null},"part":"","note":""}],"dimensionsNote":"Dimensions checked: Measured; 11/11/1999 by rk","marksAndInscriptions":[{"content":"Engraved with the owner's initials 'J.L.'","inscriber":{"name":{"text":"","id":"A8877"},"association":{"text":"","id":""}},"date":{"text":"","earliest":null,"latest":null},"description":"","interpretation":"","language":"","medium":"","method":"","position":"","script":"","translation":"","transliteration":"","type":"","note":""}],"objectHistory":"Made in Sheffield or Birmingham","historicalContext":"","briefDescription":"Dessert spoon, Birmingham ca.1800","bibliographicReferences":[],"production":"","productionType":{"text":"","id":""},"contentDescription":"","contentPlaces":[],"associatedPlaces":[],"contentPerson":[],"associatedPerson":[],"contentOrganisations":[],"associatedOrganisations":[],"contentPeople":[],"associatedPeople":[],"contentEvents":[],"associatedEvents":[],"contentOthers":[],"contentConcepts":[],"contentLiteraryRefs":[],"galleryLabels":[{"text":"British Galleries:\nAlthough it was difficult to make large spoons out of Sheffield plate, they were still cheaper than those made of  silver. In this example a die-stamped bowl has been soldered to a separately made stem. Like most surviving plated spoons, it has not worn well which explains why they were not popular.","date":{"text":"27/03/2003","earliest":"2003-03-27","latest":"2003-03-27"}}],"partNumbers":["M.47-1992"],"accessionNumberNum":"47","accessionNumberPrefix":"M","accessionYear":1992,"otherNumbers":[],"copyNumber":"","aspects":["WHOLE"],"assets":["2019LN1185","2019LR0412","2019LP8972","2019LU1166"],"recordModificationDate":"2025-04-12","recordCreationDate":"2003-03-27","availableToBook":false}}