{"meta":{"version":"2.1","_links":{"self":{"href":"https://api.vam.ac.uk/v2/object/O122395"},"collection_page":{"href":"https://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O122395/"}},"images":{"_primary_thumbnail":"https://framemark.vam.ac.uk/collections/2006BB4791/full/!100,100/0/default.jpg","_iiif_image":"https://framemark.vam.ac.uk/collections/2006BB4791/","_alt_iiif_image":[],"imageResolution":"high","_images_meta":[{"assetRef":"2006BB4791","copyright":"© Victoria and Albert Museum, London","sensitiveImage":false}]},"see_also":{"_iiif_pres":"https://iiif.vam.ac.uk/collections/O122395/manifest.json","_alt_iiif_pres":[]}},"record":{"systemNumber":"O122395","accessionNumber":"T.37&A-1951","objectType":"Wedding dress","titles":[],"summaryDescription":"In the nineteenth century the bride's dress was the focal point of a wedding just as it often is today. The fashionable cut and rich material lavished on this gown show that it was clearly designed for a prosperous bride. With its crisp, simple lines and high waist and gored skirt worn over a crinoline cage, it is similar to styles depicted in contemporary photographs and fashion plates. The shimmering silk satin, delicate lace trimmings and pleated bertha ( a collar-like  trimming) give the gown a sumptuous quality as would have befitted a wealthy bride. \r\n\r\nThe colour is also significant as brides of social standing tended to wear white, ivory or cream. The fashion for white wedding dresses started in the mid-eighteenth century, although most people were married in coloured gowns. By the early nineteenth century more and more women opted for white as it implied purity, cleanliness and social refinement. The less well off or more practically minded chose pale blue, dove grey or fawn which they could wear for special occasions long after the event. \r\n\r\nIt was, however, acceptable and even desirable for fashionable brides to customise their dresses for the early days of married life. In this example there is evidence that long net sleeves were once attached to the short oversleeves and a chemisette would probably have covered the neck. As weddings took place during the day it was usually considered unseemly to reveal a low décolletage or bare arms. Net was ideal as it provided a modest covering without destroying the effect of the dress and could easily be removed to create a fashionable evening gown.","physicalDescription":"Wedding dress (bodice and skirt) of silk satin trimmed with needle lace. Bodice has an off-the-shoulder neckline, back lacing, and is lined with cotton and whalebone strips. The skirt is full with a train. ","artistMakerPerson":[{"name":{"text":"Unknown","id":"A1848"},"association":{"text":"","id":""},"note":""}],"artistMakerOrganisations":[],"artistMakerPeople":[],"materials":[{"text":"silk satin","id":"x33509"},{"text":"needle lace","id":"AAT231662"},{"text":"whalebone","id":"AAT192974"},{"text":"cotton (textile)","id":"AAT14067"}],"techniques":[{"text":"dress making","id":"AAT53650"},{"text":"needle lace making","id":"x29416"}],"materialsAndTechniques":"Silk satin, needle lace, cotton and whalebone strips","categories":[{"text":"Fashion","id":"THES48957"},{"text":"Marriage","id":"THES48921"},{"text":"Evening wear","id":"THES48999"},{"text":"Formal wear","id":"THES48950"},{"text":"Clothing","id":"THES48975"}],"styles":[],"collectionCode":{"text":"T&F","id":"THES48601"},"images":["2006BB4791"],"imageResolution":"high","galleryLocations":[{"current":{"text":"009","id":"THES307487"},"free":"","case":"","shelf":"","box":""},{"current":{"text":"009","id":"THES307487"},"free":"","case":"","shelf":"","box":""}],"partTypes":[[{"text":"Wedding skirt","id":""}],[{"text":"Wedding bodice","id":""}]],"contentWarnings":[{"apprise":"","note":""},{"apprise":"","note":""},{"apprise":"","note":""}],"placesOfOrigin":[{"place":{"text":"Massachusetts","id":"x28996"},"association":{"text":"made","id":"x28654"},"note":""}],"productionDates":[{"date":{"text":"1867","earliest":"1867-01-01","latest":"1867-12-31"},"association":{"text":"made","id":"x28654"},"note":""},{"date":{"text":"October 3 1867","earliest":"1867-10-03","latest":"1867-10-03"},"association":{"text":"worn","id":"x34724"},"note":""}],"associatedObjects":[],"creditLine":"Given by Mrs Campbell","dimensions":[{"dimension":"Length","value":"22.9","unit":"cm","qualifier":"","date":{"text":"","earliest":null,"latest":null},"part":"bodice","note":"measurement converted from department register"},{"dimension":"Length","value":"109.2","unit":"cm","qualifier":"","date":{"text":"","earliest":null,"latest":null},"part":"skirt","note":"measurement converted from department register"},{"dimension":"Width","value":"48.3","unit":"cm","qualifier":"","date":{"text":"","earliest":null,"latest":null},"part":"across neckline","note":"measurement converted from department register"},{"dimension":"Width","value":"31.7","unit":"cm","qualifier":"","date":{"text":"","earliest":null,"latest":null},"part":"waist","note":"measurement converted from department register"}],"dimensionsNote":"","marksAndInscriptions":[],"objectHistory":"This dress was worn by Charlotte Clark (May 8 1832-March 29 1873) for her marriage to James Fowler Dwight (30/1/1830-?) on October 3 1867 in Stockbridge, Massachusetts.\r\n\r\nThe dress was donated by their granddaughter, who also donated her mother's wedding dress (T.38&A-1951), her great-grandmother's wedding dress (T.36-1951) and her own (T.39-1951).","historicalContext":"James Dwight was a lawyer based in New York. For 24 years he was Assistant US District Attorney with Theodore Sedgwick. While in the office he dedicated himself energetically to the suppression of the slave trade that was carried on clandestinely from the port of New York. From 1861 he served in the Union army during the American Civil War as Seed Lieutenant of Cavalry in the Fremont Hussars in St. Louis, and by 1863 he had become Provost Marshal General of Missouri, Kansas and Arkansas. As his cousin was also Provost Judge of Louisiana, they controlled the whole slave territory west of the Mississippi. In July 1865 he was mustered out of service by General Sheridan, and returned to New York.\r\n\r\nIn 1867 he married Charlotte Clark, the daughter of Cyrus Sullivan Clark and Charlotte Cooley. They had two children, but sadly Charlotte died a week after the birth of her daughter, Charlotte Mabel Dwight.","briefDescription":"Satin and lace wedding dress, 1867, USA; probably Massachusetts. Worn by Charlotte Clark at her wedding on October 3 1867","bibliographicReferences":[],"production":"","productionType":{"text":"","id":""},"contentDescription":"","contentPlaces":[],"associatedPlaces":[],"contentPerson":[],"associatedPerson":[],"contentOrganisations":[],"associatedOrganisations":[],"contentPeople":[],"associatedPeople":[],"contentEvents":[],"associatedEvents":[],"contentOthers":[],"contentConcepts":[],"contentLiteraryRefs":[],"galleryLabels":[],"partNumbers":["T.37A-1951","T.37-1951"],"accessionNumberNum":"37","accessionNumberPrefix":"T","accessionYear":1951,"otherNumbers":[],"copyNumber":"","aspects":["WHOLE","Wedding skirt","Wedding bodice"],"assets":[],"recordModificationDate":"2026-04-10","recordCreationDate":"2006-03-28","availableToBook":true}}